Summary
SUSPICIO proposes an entirely new hypothesis in the field of modern history as well as in Hispanic studies: that security became a key concept of governance in the late Spanish Empire (ca.1770–1820). This phenomenon began in the last quarter of 18th century when Spain felt the threat of losing its American colonies through external events that questioned the colonial rule, including US independ-ence and the influence of the French revolution. The perception of threat and the Spanish government’s distrust of their own population in America gave rise to extensive security regulations and measures in order to protect the colonial order.
With my extensive expertise in both archive research and Hispanic studies, SUSPICIO will, for the first time, study thus far neglected sources of political crime. The novel approach to these sources will ana-lyse how the colonial administration identified and judged those individuals who were perceived to be a threat to the order, i.e., who were categorised as ‘suspects’. There was no longer the requirement for a rebellious act to already have occurred in order to make an individual an enemy of the state, but ra-ther the mere suspicion that a person would perhaps – in the future – act against the state.
SUSPICIO will study to what extent the creation and persecution of ‘suspects’ polarised the people so that, rather than preserving the colonial rule, it had a debilitating effect. By regarding the ambivalence and counterproductive effects of security politics, the project promises a new interpretation of the dis-solution of the Spanish Empire. Its case may serve as an example, even for today, of how supra-national political entities can collapse under the pressure of security concerns, even though these secu-rity measures were meant to preserve them.
With my extensive expertise in both archive research and Hispanic studies, SUSPICIO will, for the first time, study thus far neglected sources of political crime. The novel approach to these sources will ana-lyse how the colonial administration identified and judged those individuals who were perceived to be a threat to the order, i.e., who were categorised as ‘suspects’. There was no longer the requirement for a rebellious act to already have occurred in order to make an individual an enemy of the state, but ra-ther the mere suspicion that a person would perhaps – in the future – act against the state.
SUSPICIO will study to what extent the creation and persecution of ‘suspects’ polarised the people so that, rather than preserving the colonial rule, it had a debilitating effect. By regarding the ambivalence and counterproductive effects of security politics, the project promises a new interpretation of the dis-solution of the Spanish Empire. Its case may serve as an example, even for today, of how supra-national political entities can collapse under the pressure of security concerns, even though these secu-rity measures were meant to preserve them.
Unfold all
/
Fold all
More information & hyperlinks
| Web resources: | https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101088128 |
| Start date: | 01-04-2024 |
| End date: | 31-03-2029 |
| Total budget - Public funding: | 1 999 706,00 Euro - 1 999 706,00 Euro |
Cordis data
Original description
SUSPICIO proposes an entirely new hypothesis in the field of modern history as well as in Hispanic studies: that security became a key concept of governance in the late Spanish Empire (ca.1770–1820). This phenomenon began in the last quarter of 18th century when Spain felt the threat of losing its American colonies through external events that questioned the colonial rule, including US independ-ence and the influence of the French revolution. The perception of threat and the Spanish government’s distrust of their own population in America gave rise to extensive security regulations and measures in order to protect the colonial order.With my extensive expertise in both archive research and Hispanic studies, SUSPICIO will, for the first time, study thus far neglected sources of political crime. The novel approach to these sources will ana-lyse how the colonial administration identified and judged those individuals who were perceived to be a threat to the order, i.e., who were categorised as ‘suspects’. There was no longer the requirement for a rebellious act to already have occurred in order to make an individual an enemy of the state, but ra-ther the mere suspicion that a person would perhaps – in the future – act against the state.
SUSPICIO will study to what extent the creation and persecution of ‘suspects’ polarised the people so that, rather than preserving the colonial rule, it had a debilitating effect. By regarding the ambivalence and counterproductive effects of security politics, the project promises a new interpretation of the dis-solution of the Spanish Empire. Its case may serve as an example, even for today, of how supra-national political entities can collapse under the pressure of security concerns, even though these secu-rity measures were meant to preserve them.
Status
SIGNEDCall topic
ERC-2022-COGUpdate Date
31-07-2023
Images
No images available.
Geographical location(s)
