Summary
In clinical care, machine learning is progressively used to enhance diagnosis, therapy choice, and effectiveness of the health system. Because machine-learning models learn from historically gathered information, populations that have suffered past human and structural biases (e.g. unequal access to education or resources) — called protected groups — are susceptible to damage from inaccurate projections or resource allocations, reinforcing health inequalities. For example, racial and gender differences exist in the way clinical data are produced and these can be transferred as biases in the models. Several techniques of algorithmic fairness have been suggested in the literature on machine learning to ameliorate the performance of machine learning with respect to its fairness. The debate in statistics and machine learning has however failed to provide a principled approach for choosing concepts of bias, prejudice, discrimination, and fairness in predictive models, with a clear link to ethical theory discussed within philosophy.
The specific scientific objectives of this research project are:
O1: ethical theory: mapping the ethical theories that are relevant for the allocation of resources in health care and draw connections with the literature in fair machine learning
O2: probabilistic ethics: understand how standard moral concepts such as responsibility, merit, need, talent, equality, and benefit can be understood in probabilistic terms
O3: epistemology of causality: understand if current claims made by counterfactual and causal models of fairness in AI are robust with respect to different philosophical understandings of probability, causality, and counterfactuals
O4: application: to show the relevance these philosophical ideas by applying them to a limited number of paradigmatic cases of the application of predictive algorithms in health care.
The specific scientific objectives of this research project are:
O1: ethical theory: mapping the ethical theories that are relevant for the allocation of resources in health care and draw connections with the literature in fair machine learning
O2: probabilistic ethics: understand how standard moral concepts such as responsibility, merit, need, talent, equality, and benefit can be understood in probabilistic terms
O3: epistemology of causality: understand if current claims made by counterfactual and causal models of fairness in AI are robust with respect to different philosophical understandings of probability, causality, and counterfactuals
O4: application: to show the relevance these philosophical ideas by applying them to a limited number of paradigmatic cases of the application of predictive algorithms in health care.
Unfold all
/
Fold all
More information & hyperlinks
| Web resources: | https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/898322 |
| Start date: | 01-09-2021 |
| End date: | 31-08-2023 |
| Total budget - Public funding: | 183 473,28 Euro - 183 473,00 Euro |
Cordis data
Original description
In clinical care, machine learning is progressively used to enhance diagnosis, therapy choice, and effectiveness of the health system. Because machine-learning models learn from historically gathered information, populations that have suffered past human and structural biases (e.g. unequal access to education or resources) — called protected groups — are susceptible to damage from inaccurate projections or resource allocations, reinforcing health inequalities. For example, racial and gender differences exist in the way clinical data are produced and these can be transferred as biases in the models. Several techniques of algorithmic fairness have been suggested in the literature on machine learning to ameliorate the performance of machine learning with respect to its fairness. The debate in statistics and machine learning has however failed to provide a principled approach for choosing concepts of bias, prejudice, discrimination, and fairness in predictive models, with a clear link to ethical theory discussed within philosophy.The specific scientific objectives of this research project are:
O1: ethical theory: mapping the ethical theories that are relevant for the allocation of resources in health care and draw connections with the literature in fair machine learning
O2: probabilistic ethics: understand how standard moral concepts such as responsibility, merit, need, talent, equality, and benefit can be understood in probabilistic terms
O3: epistemology of causality: understand if current claims made by counterfactual and causal models of fairness in AI are robust with respect to different philosophical understandings of probability, causality, and counterfactuals
O4: application: to show the relevance these philosophical ideas by applying them to a limited number of paradigmatic cases of the application of predictive algorithms in health care.
Status
CLOSEDCall topic
MSCA-IF-2019Update Date
28-04-2024
Images
No images available.
Geographical location(s)
