Permafrost Region Greenhouse Gas Budgets Suggest a Weak CO₂ Sink and CH₄ and N₂O Sources, But Magnitudes Differ Between Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Methods

This is a publication. If there is no link to the publication on this page, you can try the pre-formated search via the search engines listed on this page.

Authors: G. Hugelius; J. Ramage; E. Burke; A. Chatterjee; T. L. Smallman; T. Aalto; A. Bastos; C. Biasi; J. G. Canadell; N. Chandra; F. Chevallier; P. Ciais; J. Chang; L. Feng; M. W. Jones; T. Kleinen; M. Kuhn; R. Lauerwald; J. Liu; E. López‐Blanco; I. T. Luijkx; M. E. Marushchak; S. M. Natali; Y. Niwa; D. Olefeldt; P. I. Palmer; P. K. Patra; W. Peters; S. Potter; B. Poulter; B. M. Rogers; W. J. Riley; M. Saunois; E. A. G. Schuur; R. L. Thompson; C. Treat; A. Tsuruta; M. R. Turetsky; A.‐M. Virkkala; C. Voigt; J. Watts; Q. Zhu; B. Zheng

Journal title: Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Journal publisher: Wiley

Published year: 2024

DOI identifier: 10.1029/2023GB007969

ISSN: 1944-9224